Key Takeaways:
- DJI issues a statement addressing inaccuracies in an ICE bulletin.
- The company argues that the report is based on misleading information from an unidentified source.
- DJI emphasizes its commitment to data privacy and robust security measures in its products.
- Allegations in the ICE bulletin are countered with factual clarifications by DJI.
DJI Responds to Inaccurate ICE Bulletin
In a proactive step towards transparency and accountability, DJI has issued a formal response to allegations made in a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) bulletin released in August. The bulletin, originating from an agent in ICE’s Los Angeles office, is claimed to be riddled with inaccuracies and misleading information, primarily sourced from an unidentified entity.
Misleading Allegations
DJI has partnered with the law firm McDermott Will & Emery to refute the claims outlined in the ICE bulletin. Through a comprehensive rebuttal, the company asserts that the underlying data supporting the allegations are fundamentally flawed. According to DJI, the assertions in the bulletin are not only erroneous but so significantly incorrect that it calls on ICE to reconsider the validity of the report.
In its statement, DJI explicitly questioned the motives of the source behind the claims, suggesting that there may be competitive interests at play aimed at undermining DJI’s legitimate business operations. Such implications raise important questions about the influence of commercial rivalry in the dissemination of information.
Refuting False Claims
Among the many assertions made in the ICE bulletin, DJI pointed out specific inaccuracies that can be easily disproven. For instance, one claim suggested that DJI systems have the capability to capture facial recognition data even when powered off—a statement that DJI categorically denies, pointing out its technological impossibility.
Additionally, the bulletin claimed that competitors, namely Parrot and Yuneec, had ceased manufacturing competitive drones and cited significant pricing discrepancies between DJI products in the U.S. and China. DJI contends that such assertions lack credible evidence and can be easily clarified through basic internet research and a fundamental understanding of the drone industry.
Commitment to Data Privacy
Furthermore, DJI highlighted its dedication to customer privacy and data protection. The company clearly stated that it does not access customers’ flight logs, photos, or videos unless users voluntarily upload and share them. To enhance user privacy, DJI has implemented a new feature called Local Data Mode, which restricts all internet traffic to and from its DJI Pilot app, thereby ensuring that sensitive flight missions are conducted without external interference.
Having established its reputation for producing advanced products for a diverse range of users, including those who require stringent security measures, DJI reaffirms its commitment to safeguarding customer data. The company has taken an advocacy role in promoting privacy rights for drone operators, contrasting itself against industry counterparts who may not share the same priorities.
Moving Forward
As the situation unfolds, DJI remains steadfast in its mission to provide high-quality, secure, and reliable products. The company’s proactive engagement in addressing misinformation reflects not only its commitment to its customers but also its resolve to uphold transparency in all operations.
For those seeking more information, DJI encourages inquiries directed to its press contact at pr@dji.com.
